A realistic guide to balancing clinical excellence and financial efficiency in modern dental practices.
Good Quality vs Maximum Profit: Can You Really Have Both?
๐ The Dilemma: Can You Deliver High-Quality Restorations and Still Be Profitable?
If youโve ever questioned whether providing top-tier prosthetics can coexist with strong financial performance, you're not alone. The good news? With the right approach, you donโt have to choose one or the other.
Letโs take a deeper look โ backed by real-world data and clinical studies โ at the true costs of in-office milling and smarter alternatives for maximizing profitability without compromising quality.
๐ ๏ธ In-Office Milling: When "Convenience" Comes at a Price
While Chairside CAD/CAM systems initially promise speed and control, their long-term operational costs and inefficiencies often outweigh those benefits.
๐ Case Study: Hidden Costs Exceeding Lab Fees
According to an analysis published in Dental Economics (2018), the total cost of producing a single crown using an in-house milling system was, on average, 15โ20% higher than outsourcing to a professional dental lab. This includes:
-
Material costs
-
Equipment maintenance and depreciation
-
Software upgrades
-
Most significantly, the dentist or trained staffโs time diverted to lab-related tasks.
Additional findings from Avant Dental and Decisions in Dentistry also show that ongoing expenses such as consumables, technician salaries, and system upkeep create a mounting financial burden over time.
Furthermore, a study in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2019) found that in-house systems have higher error and remake rates than external labs โ resulting in wasted materials, longer chair times, and decreased patient satisfaction.
๐ธ The True Costs of In-House Milling
1. Accumulating Direct Costs
-
Premium block prices due to low-volume ordering
-
Frequent bur/tool replacements
-
Recurring maintenance, repairs, software fees, and depreciation
2. Lost Opportunity Time
-
Valuable time spent on scanning, designing, finishing, and equipment upkeep
-
Time that could otherwise be used for revenue-generating patient care
-
Every hour behind the machine is an hour lost from your core skill โ dentistry
3. Quality Limitations and Workflow Disruptions
-
In-house systems often underperform on complex or high-aesthetic cases
-
Increased errors lead to rework, longer appointments, and possible loss of patient trust
โ The Smarter Strategy: Collaborate With a Trusted Dental Lab
When considering total costs โ both direct and indirect โ outsourcing to a professional dental lab often results in better financial outcomes and higher-quality restorations.
Focus on what matters most: treating patients and growing your practice.
๐ฏ How to Choose the Right Lab Partner
Look beyond cost alone. The right dental lab should offer:
-
Consistent precision and craftsmanship
-
Fast turnaround and proactive communication
-
Low remake rates and accountability
-
Scalability as your clinic grows
A high-quality lab is not an expense โ itโs a strategic asset that supports your clinical goals and financial success.
๐ References
-
Dental Economics. (2018). The hidden costs of in-office milling.
-
Avant Dental. Decisions in Dentistry: Cost analysis of chairside CAD/CAM.
-
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. (2019). Systematic review on CAD/CAM denture accuracy and efficiency.
COMMENTS