Skip to content
Gemini_Generated_Image_dxbptbdxbptbdxbp
Kevin ChoApr 21, 2025 9:30:00 AM2 min read

Good Quality vs Maximum Profit: Can You Really Have Both?

Good Quality vs Maximum Profit: Can You Really Have Both?
3:18

A realistic guide to balancing clinical excellence and financial efficiency in modern dental practices.


Good Quality vs Maximum Profit: Can You Really Have Both?

Gemini_Generated_Image_yt6i0nyt6i0nyt6i

๐Ÿ”Ž The Dilemma: Can You Deliver High-Quality Restorations and Still Be Profitable?

If youโ€™ve ever questioned whether providing top-tier prosthetics can coexist with strong financial performance, you're not alone. The good news? With the right approach, you donโ€™t have to choose one or the other.

Letโ€™s take a deeper look โ€” backed by real-world data and clinical studies โ€” at the true costs of in-office milling and smarter alternatives for maximizing profitability without compromising quality.


๐Ÿ› ๏ธ In-Office Milling: When "Convenience" Comes at a Price

While Chairside CAD/CAM systems initially promise speed and control, their long-term operational costs and inefficiencies often outweigh those benefits.


๐Ÿ“Š Case Study: Hidden Costs Exceeding Lab Fees

According to an analysis published in Dental Economics (2018), the total cost of producing a single crown using an in-house milling system was, on average, 15โ€“20% higher than outsourcing to a professional dental lab. This includes:

  • Material costs

  • Equipment maintenance and depreciation

  • Software upgrades

  • Most significantly, the dentist or trained staffโ€™s time diverted to lab-related tasks.

Additional findings from Avant Dental and Decisions in Dentistry also show that ongoing expenses such as consumables, technician salaries, and system upkeep create a mounting financial burden over time.

Furthermore, a study in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2019) found that in-house systems have higher error and remake rates than external labs โ€” resulting in wasted materials, longer chair times, and decreased patient satisfaction.


๐Ÿ’ธ The True Costs of In-House Milling

1. Accumulating Direct Costs

  • Premium block prices due to low-volume ordering

  • Frequent bur/tool replacements

  • Recurring maintenance, repairs, software fees, and depreciation

2. Lost Opportunity Time

  • Valuable time spent on scanning, designing, finishing, and equipment upkeep

  • Time that could otherwise be used for revenue-generating patient care

  • Every hour behind the machine is an hour lost from your core skill โ€” dentistry

3. Quality Limitations and Workflow Disruptions

  • In-house systems often underperform on complex or high-aesthetic cases

  • Increased errors lead to rework, longer appointments, and possible loss of patient trust


โœ… The Smarter Strategy: Collaborate With a Trusted Dental Lab

When considering total costs โ€” both direct and indirect โ€” outsourcing to a professional dental lab often results in better financial outcomes and higher-quality restorations.

Focus on what matters most: treating patients and growing your practice.


๐ŸŽฏ How to Choose the Right Lab Partner

Look beyond cost alone. The right dental lab should offer:

  • Consistent precision and craftsmanship

  • Fast turnaround and proactive communication

  • Low remake rates and accountability

  • Scalability as your clinic grows

A high-quality lab is not an expense โ€” itโ€™s a strategic asset that supports your clinical goals and financial success.


๐Ÿ“š References

  • Dental Economics. (2018). The hidden costs of in-office milling.

  • Avant Dental. Decisions in Dentistry: Cost analysis of chairside CAD/CAM.

  • Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. (2019). Systematic review on CAD/CAM denture accuracy and efficiency.

 

 

COMMENTS

RELATED ARTICLES